Is basic Scotch quality degrading or is it just our imagination? Musings following a blind tasting competition

Last month I participated in a blind tasting competition. Yeah, again. I know, I should see a shrink about this but I don’t have spare $$ for it as I spend the money on whisky. Besides, if I stop buying whisky in order to save the money for the shrink, The problem will naturally get dissolved and I won’t need it so why bother? 😉

Anyway, the competition was held here locally in Israel and contained 14 blind drams ranging from Glenlivet 12yo to Talisker 18yo with a few oddballs thrown in. Naturally I had many failures but too many revealed whiskies made me pull my hair, curse and scream “how did I miss that one?”

Photo Credit: Shai Gilboa

Photo Credit: Shai Gilboa

Here, take those short notes and try guessing the whisky:

Question_mark_(black_on_white)Nose: Crisp, dry and sharp peat smoke, very clean. There’s noticeable sherry sweetness here, malty, Doesn’t smell like high ABV nor 40%

Palate: Strong harsh dry peat, sherry sweetness.

Finish: Long, peat and ashes, lingering sherry sweetness.

Age: Young as there’s strong malt notes.

ABV: It feels like 46%

My guess for this one was Kilchoman Loch Gorm (5yo, 46%) but of course I was wrong. (keep reading for true identity).

Blind competitions are hard. many times it’s not easy to detect the finish type (sherry and port are very similar), different whiskies can smell and taste the same or very similar. your smell and taste senses works different on any given day. And you know what? it’s even harder to detect the whisky if it’s not a single cask bottling. Yes, I do think it’s harder to detect batch produced whisky than single casks and it leads me to the worrying trends I saw from this tasting:

1. For many basic whiskies the distillery trademark notes are diminished  – Too many distilleries trademark notes, those we tend to associate with whiskies from this distillery, for decades if not for longer, were missing.

For example, our bottle of Glenlivet 12? It didn’t have the expected green apples notes I was used to find in Glenlivet bottles. Remember the tasting notes above? No, it wasn’t Kilchoman – it was Laphroaig 10. It had very weak iodine and maritime notes. The Oban 10 wasn’t barely coastal and maritime. The Auchentoshan 12 didn’t have the smoothness I tend to associate with triple distillation and with heavier sherry influence, and there were more…

At first I thought it’s only my imagination, as for some of those whiskies, I last tasted them 2-3 years ago. But I then compared the notes I wrote for them with previous notes and remarks I had and other competitors remarks and it seems I wasn’t alone with this conclusion. I also checked past reviews from blogs I trust and it all led to the second and even more worrying trend:

2. There’s a batch quality degrade overtime – Folks, for too many basic expressions, the whisky we taste now differs from the same whisky of 2-3 years ago. The truth is that the distilleries can’t meet up the demand without sacrifices and we probably cannot trust the distilleries to really keep all batches up to the high standard.

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think it’s by design but I have no other explanation to the difference. Maybe not all casks going into the vatting now are top quality,  Maybe for each batch they strive to make it as close as possible to the previous batch, but all those minor changes between batches accumulate and coupled with the rising demand and lack of resources, makes those entry level whiskies different from the batches of few years ago. There’s always a gradual change in whisky but in the last few years it’s been so a rapid change that the taste is now different and it takes just 2-3 years to notice it instead of 5-8 years.

What does the future holds for us? Probably no good news. As long as the demand is on the rise, the batch consistency and taste will keep changing (and for worse in my opinion) more rapidly than before. Does it means that quality is degrading? What should we do? I think it means you need to stock up bottles of whiskies you love now. The same whisky may be utterly different despite having the same label and distillery recipe. It’s a process I’ve already started working according to, trying to buy whisky I like now and not wait and buy it in the future. And I intend to keep doing so as long as I can as I don’t want to get so disappointed in the future. You should so too!

Whisky Review – Talisker Skye

Talisker distillery is restless and so it released another new release – Talisker Skye. It’s the fourth new release in the last two years. Yes, your eyesight is perfect. Read it again, it ain’t no mistake: four new Talisker NAS releases in the last two years.

For a distillery that used to have a very thin yet muscled core line-up, this is quite a big change, doubling their lineup offerings from four whiskies to eight. So what’s the reasoning of releasing yet another (NAS) whisky (beyond the growing demand for single malts)?

This time it looks like they are trying to target a new audience and broaden their customer base with an offer of a softer whisky while retaining the Talisker identity. Lets check if it does work that way:

Talisker Skye (45.8%, £38.95/€31.95)

talisker skyeNose: Initial notes of peat and pepper, then comes the other half of the equation with vanilla, sweet honey, pears and peaches. After a few minutes, the peat note now seriously lag behinds, the pepper is dimnished and it’s more gentle, round and sweeter. With even more time there’s almost no peat and pepper and it’s mostly sweet and vanilla. Continue reading

Whisky Review – Glendronach 12 Year Old Sauternes Finish

Just mention Glendronach Distillery to any whisky aficionado and there are good chances the words ‘Sherry Casks’ will popup in the discussion quicker than you can say Jack Robinson. After all, Glendronach are recognized for the fabulous work they do with Oloroso and PX sherry casks, either with the OB bottlings or with the single casks batches.

But it’s not a catholic marriage as Glendronach do Squint sideways and ‘sin’ with different cask types and finishes. There are port finishes (like the 15/18yo I reviewed here) and wine finishes. Lately Glendronach releases a few new interesting non-sherry finishes: Sauternes and Marsala wine finishes and today we’ll review the Sauternes release.

It’s a 12 year old expression which replaces the 14 yo Sauternes finish expression from four years ago (which has now been discontinued). Did you notice the reduced age? The same happened now with Benriach Sauternes (reduced from 16 to 15) as the demand for whisky far outstrip the available warehouse-matured casks. Anyway, this whisky is initially matured in European oak and then finished in a small batch of Sauternes wine casks. Not all Sauternes finishes are good as it does lend some strong influence of sweet and wine tannins. Let’s check how well does it work here.

Glendronach 12 Year Old Sauternes Finish (46%, £39/€46.5)

glendronach 12yo sauternes finishNose: Starts with sweet white wine including some tannins, very fresh. Then some scented fruits and gentle sweet notes of pears and green unripe apples (it bite a bit with acidity). Also showing: green cardamom. Overall it’s a very gentle and delicate nose, sweet and rounded. Continue reading

Whisky Review – Tomatin Cù Bòcan Virgin Oak Edition

After reviewing yesterday the new Tomatin Cask Strength, let’s review Tomains’ second new release – The Cù Bòcan Virgin Oak. It’s the second release in the trilogy showcasing the influence of each cask type which makes up Cù Bòcan: Sherry, Virgin Oak and Bourbon. I reviewed the Sherry in the past and now it’s time to try the virgin oak edition.

Like the sherry edition, there are only 6000 bottles available and it was fully matured in First Fill Virgin Oak casks which should lend us lots of sweetness, vanilla and coconut. How well will it work with the peat?

Tomatin Cù Bòcan Virgin Oak Edition (46%, £49.95/€61.95)

Cù-Bòcan-Virgin-OakNose: A very fresh and interesting nose, It starts with a moderate-to-weak peat wave but soon its taking backseat to sweet pears and apricots, vanilla, massive sweetness, almost too much but still fresh and a bit zesty. Continue reading

Whisky Review – Tomatin Cask Strength

It’s been a while since I posted some notes as I was immersed in a blind tasting competition where I finished at top half but not too close to the top. I’ll have some post with my thoughts on the competition but I need some more time to get them into coherent and logical post so in the meanwhile let’s review some new additions on the whisky shelves, starting with the new Tomatin Cask Strength expression.

Till now all OB from Tomatin were bottled in 46% and lower so this is a new and great refreshment to the lineup. The whisky was matured in a combination of Bourbon barrels and Oloroso Sherry casks, 15,000 bottled were produced and it was bottled at cask strength of 57.5%.

Tomatin Cask Strength (57.5%, £48.95/€51.75)

Cask StrengthNose: starts with malt and sweet honey. Then a big sweet and light stewed fruits glazed with golden syrup and cinnamon sprinkles. The youth and malt notes still pop up over again like bubbles. A few minutes in the glass reveals drops of tropical juice and the nutmeg kinda replaces the cinnamon one. There’s no stronger sherry influence where the sweet sugar gets darker and brown, raisins and dark sweet wine. With a few drops of water it’s lighter and fruitier but retain the overall impression. Continue reading

Whisky Review and Tasting Notes: Glen Elgin 12 Year Old

The local blind tasting competition continue and I had another good revelation with last night dram: Glen Elgin 12 year old.

Last night was not my first encounter with this whisky as I tasted it last summer, but the previous encounter wasn’t in a proper tasting environment, small dose in a small plastic cup so didn’t write myself notes and all I remembered was its fruitiness. That truly made it hard to make the connection to last night dram as the saltiness here was a key factor.

Glen Elgin 12 Year Old (43%, £31.95/€32.99)

glen-elgin-12-year-old-whiskyNose: Those are ex-bourbon casks for sure with vanilla and heather honey. At first there was even a big floral note bordering perfume. Some concentrated fruits (mainly apricots), lots of saltiness. heavy yet fresh. Continue reading

Whisky Review – Tobermory 10 Year Old (46.3%)

I’m taking part in (yet another) blind tasting competition. This time it’s an event organized for the local wine & alcohol forum. The first entry was Tomatin 14 which I reviewed in the past and failed to recognized it. The 2nd one was Tobermory 10 (the newer version with the higher ABV). I failed to recognized it but did get some points for guessing the age correctly 🙂

Tobermory 10 Year Old (46.3%, £29.45)

tobermory 10 new 46.3Nose: Heavy notes of malt, ‘dirty’ hay, honey and vanilla. This one is surely young as there are whiffs of new make notes and lots of malt. Given some time there’s a bit of milk chocolate, , sour berries with sugary sweetness which then develop and almost overtake the malt/honey/hay combo with strong strawberries note.
Continue reading

Whisky Review of SMWS 127.40 Mango chicken vindaloo- Port Charlotte is a perfect storm dram!

As the storm is now in full force over my little country, and snow is covering some surprising places, it’s time to review a storm dram, a peated and sweet-fruity dram, something like a Port Charlotte from the SMWS – 127.40 Mango chicken vindaloo.

It’s no secret I’m a fan of the Scotch Malt Whisky Society (SMWS) and their bottlings, their venues are on my must visit places whenever I come over to UK/Scotland and I LOVE their peated bottlings. A previous SMWS Port Charlote bottling was one of my favorites of 2013 and I was waiting eagerly to lay my hands on another bottle. I tried in vain to get a bottle of this but had to settle for a bottle-share (although I did get another one later, but that’s a review for another time).

And so, armed with a 100ml bottle of this Port Charlotte, aged 12 years from a Refill Ex-Bourbon Hogshead that yielded only 159 bottles, I’m ready for mother nature this weekend.

SMWS 127.40 Mango chicken vindaloo (63%, 159 bottles)

Photo credit: benswhisky.co.uk

Photo credit: benswhisky.co.uk

Nose: Massive peat and fruity nose, chutney, pears, peaches and a bit of apricots, the peat is there in the background (quite a massive background!) supporting the front fruits. After a few minutes there are strong notes of malt and cereal. Added water and all I can say is WOW. It opens up fantastically, retaining the palette of the notes but it’s now layered and sharpened. The fruits notes gets tropical with added tanned pineapples juice, there’s less peat, indeed chicken meat shows up and it’s lovely and deeper.

Palate: Sweet peat with ashes and a bit of soot, sweet stewed fruits, cereals, very thick and meaty. With water, less sweet and less peat, lighter and better. grilled chicken, tropical fruits and depth.

Finish: Very long with peat, ashes, lingering fruits sweetness.

Thoughts: Cold, rain, hail or snow, I’m ready! It’s a top dram, rounded and nicely balanced notes. Best to have it with a few drops of water, maybe melted snow will do? 🙂

Whisky Review – Laphroaig 15 yo (1998-2014) Signatory Vingtage Cask #700384

It’s a gloomy and wintry weather here this week and the forecast for the weekend promise a real cold, rainy and snowy weekend around here. I guess it’s time to prepare with another peated dram, right?

Let’s get back to my favorite distillery and pick a 15 year old bottling by Signatory, bottled as part of their Un-chilfiltered Collection from  a refill sherry butt.

Laphroaig 15 yo (1998-2014) Signatory Vingtage Cask #700384 (46%, 797 bottles, €69.90)

laphroaig 15 signatory vintage 1998Nose: Ahh, love that Laphroaig nose – Peat and soot, engine oil and BBQ coal, a bit of burnt matches, dry warm rubber boots. There’s the sherry impact with nutmeg, soaked raisins, sour berries. Continue reading